thechidz
Jan 31, 08:49 PM
Dang!!!! awesome deal!
MacTech68
Jun 26, 07:31 AM
I did this years ago on a MacPlus with a dialup account but discovered that MacTCP v2.0.6 would reliably crash.
Downgrading to MacTCP 2.0.4 fixed that problem but I never discovered exactly where or why this conflict occurred.
:)
________
electronic cigarettes (http://**************)
Downgrading to MacTCP 2.0.4 fixed that problem but I never discovered exactly where or why this conflict occurred.
:)
________
electronic cigarettes (http://**************)
Elynor
Apr 15, 11:20 AM
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8G4 Safari/6533.18.5)
I take it this is an external drive?
Does it work under Windows 7 on your Mac?
B
Nope, it was able to detect it, but was not able to read it, windows 7 asked me to format before use...
but i do have important stuff inside
I take it this is an external drive?
Does it work under Windows 7 on your Mac?
B
Nope, it was able to detect it, but was not able to read it, windows 7 asked me to format before use...
but i do have important stuff inside
Shellyshell
Apr 29, 07:18 AM
I'm still waiting for Rovio to fix my angry birds freezing problem. Note to self, never update! Anyhow, I found this angry birds parody to sooth my angry birds addiction for another day.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0ZnB4uX9xs&feature=relmfu
Michelle
PS: get your act together Rovio, I'm dying :mad:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0ZnB4uX9xs&feature=relmfu
Michelle
PS: get your act together Rovio, I'm dying :mad:
aggieandrew
Dec 1, 07:11 PM
Couldn't somebody manufacture a mirror attachment to let you use the back-facing camera as a front-facing camera? It wouldn't be as good as a camera on the front but would it work well enough to let you do two-way videocalls now?
Software can certainly reverse a mirror image so that shouldn't be a holdup.
I was going to suggest that same thing, then decided I should read the others posts in the thread. I'm no physicist, but I think since you'd need two mirrors, you wouldn't have to worry about the image being reversed.
Software can certainly reverse a mirror image so that shouldn't be a holdup.
I was going to suggest that same thing, then decided I should read the others posts in the thread. I'm no physicist, but I think since you'd need two mirrors, you wouldn't have to worry about the image being reversed.
D*I*S_Frontman
Aug 14, 12:34 PM
RATS!!
I was hoping this news would cause Apple Stock to tank.
Nope.
Up 41% for the year, 24% for the month, and 2% on the day at the time of this writing ($64.92/share)
I was broke when Apple Stock was $12/share in 2002. Had I scrounged to buy then I'd be sitting pretty now. I even made that recommendation to friends...
Today I thought the usual anti-Apple fearmongering Wall Street is known for would have hit the stock harder and afford another bargain opportunity.
Oh well...
I was hoping this news would cause Apple Stock to tank.
Nope.
Up 41% for the year, 24% for the month, and 2% on the day at the time of this writing ($64.92/share)
I was broke when Apple Stock was $12/share in 2002. Had I scrounged to buy then I'd be sitting pretty now. I even made that recommendation to friends...
Today I thought the usual anti-Apple fearmongering Wall Street is known for would have hit the stock harder and afford another bargain opportunity.
Oh well...
iSaint
Oct 18, 08:22 PM
I wonder if it would look better with a different color desktop on the MacBook?!
Marty Macfly
Jun 6, 04:05 PM
You should have the "real"s move up and down the columns... like elevators. ;)
btbrossard
Feb 23, 02:20 AM
It's all wrong.
Wrong fonts
Wrong layout
Wrong placement of text
Looks amateurish
Sorry. Get a professional to do this for you.
Considering some of the crap I've seen "professionals" turn out, the blue/black ones aren't that bad.
Wrong fonts
Wrong layout
Wrong placement of text
Looks amateurish
Sorry. Get a professional to do this for you.
Considering some of the crap I've seen "professionals" turn out, the blue/black ones aren't that bad.
qubex
Oct 26, 04:46 AM
I'd buy it instantly if it did it's computation in the front-end.
VideoCave
Apr 8, 11:24 AM
I dont use imovie but I do know you can right click on your imovie project file and then look for an option to "Show Package Contents" and everything that is involved in that project is self contained in there. And you should be able to get your video out and recreate your project.
Huntn
Oct 9, 12:20 PM
I don't understand what the OP is asking. Are you being silly or talking single shot weapon, what game?
dotnina
Jan 22, 05:27 PM
I had a folder called "Psych Notes" and I made an identical folder called "Psych Notes." The new folder had some additional files, and did not have some of the files that the original "Psych Notes" folder had.
Now, since the new folder was better organized with good file names, I decided that the new "Psych Notes" folder should become THE one and only "Psych Notes" folder on my hard drive. I dragged the folder to the correct directory in order to replace the old folder.
I got the dialogue "Are you sure you want to replace ... [Stop] [Replace]" and I said yes, please replace. Now I realize I have a very important file -- two and a half weeks worth of lecture notes(!!!) in the original psych folder. Is it gone forever? It's not in my trash, and I already did too many things in order to use Finder's "Undo" ... yeah, I know.
Please oh please tell me there's some way to get this file back? :(
Now, since the new folder was better organized with good file names, I decided that the new "Psych Notes" folder should become THE one and only "Psych Notes" folder on my hard drive. I dragged the folder to the correct directory in order to replace the old folder.
I got the dialogue "Are you sure you want to replace ... [Stop] [Replace]" and I said yes, please replace. Now I realize I have a very important file -- two and a half weeks worth of lecture notes(!!!) in the original psych folder. Is it gone forever? It's not in my trash, and I already did too many things in order to use Finder's "Undo" ... yeah, I know.
Please oh please tell me there's some way to get this file back? :(
Proph3T
Jun 19, 06:34 PM
if you havent noticed there isnt an apple story anywhere near moscow... spokane doesnt even have one. good luck buddy
TheOnlyJon
Feb 13, 12:42 PM
Apologies for shameless self-promotion, but check out my blog on dormroom design. Hasn't been updated in a long while, but I usually add more posts at the beginning and end of the school year.
NottaDorm.com (http://nottadorm.com/)
NottaDorm.com (http://nottadorm.com/)
ortuno2k
Jul 26, 12:47 PM
I upgraded my 3G to iOS 4 and now I'm regretting having done so. At first it seemed to be somewhat faster, but a few days later after I loaded my data (contacts, music, emails), I noticed that the phone's performance went down to the floor.
Now I'm considering going back to 3.1.3.
Now I'm considering going back to 3.1.3.
WGoins88
Mar 16, 09:12 AM
That's exactly what it is. They will pay it because it's Apple. I can't believe that just 2 years ago I sold a 800MHz Quicksilver 2002 tower on eBay for $265 + shipping.
On the other hand, there ARE some overpriced Apple products on there that have been on there for months and months. I've seen G5 towers on there for 4-6 months because people still think they are worth $600-800.
On the other hand, there ARE some overpriced Apple products on there that have been on there for months and months. I've seen G5 towers on there for 4-6 months because people still think they are worth $600-800.
Mad Mac Maniac
Mar 29, 09:09 AM
OK MikhailT, I'm not sure if you didn't actually read my posts, are just an unhelpful person, or if I was unclear in some way. Let me break it down.
If the iPad devices are as powerful as our computers, we would not be experiencing any issues in Safari. You're talking about just 256MB of RAM in the first-gen iPad and 512MB in second-gen iPad which are able to handle the sites in Safari much better than it does in the first-gen iPad. Add 2GB-4GB to the iPad, Mobile Safari would be able to handle 20 sites without any refreshing required.
Yes, I acknowledged that Macs have significantly more RAM than the 512mb of iPad 2's, but that doesn't remove the possibility. If the iPad had 2gb of RAM it would conceivably happen eventually. Say on my macbook running lion I were to open 30 safari tabs (for some people that is not uncommon), then my wife comes and uploads pictures, edits them in Lightroom, then plays some angry birds. Then my (hypothetical) kids come along and play a few hardware intensive games, and maybe open a new safari window to browse the internet. Then I come back and write some word documents and excel spreadsheets. I go to bed, then go to work the next day (who knows what all my wife and kids do on the computer). EVERYTHING is left "open" because we are on Lion so nobody closes anything. I come home and go back to my safari tabs. Is it even POSSIBLE to have some of the tabs disappear or need to be refreshed to view? Would some of my full screen "spaces" apps disappear as well? What if my macbook only has 1gb of RAM? That's only double the iPad 2. I don't think it's that inconceivable
Secondly, Apple didn't take open/close lights away, it is now an optional setting in the Systems Preferences. The reason Apple did this is because they want to remove the idea of "open"/"closed" states.
I know why they did it. And that is the way Apple wants it, that's why it's default. If it were up to Apple the option to put it back would be gone. But they were smart enough to anticipate the "outrage"
The software are starting to catch up to the hardware in terms of speed that we can leave applications and return to it in the same state. Apple wants to be able to introduce the concept of *resuming* apps, not *closed*. When you restart Lion with open apps, Lion will restart with the same open apps in the same state. This is the future on Mac OS X. No more closing required, especially with a fast SSD.
This is my point of concern. No closing could cause apps to "close" that you didn't want them to. Now most of them would be able to *resume* as left with no issue. But would 30 safari tabs be handled the same way?
The hard drive/ssd in today's computers are much faster than the NANDs in the current iPad. Resuming an app is much faster than it would be on a modern computer. Look at how fast apps are resuming from the previous state in the iPad 2 and you can see how much the hardware difference is affecting the performance.
speed of resuming has nothing to do with what I'm talking about...
The other thing that you need to consider is the memory swap. Mac OS X have swap, iOS doesn't. Even if you run out of free memory on the Macs, you'll begin to switch to the harddrive/ssd to use as virtual memory.Well finally we get to something that might actually be helpful. This would help to explain why Macs don't do this. But are there any issues/concerns with this?
If you had tried running Lion, you would know by now that this is simply not the case.
Well, I obviously haven't. That's why I'm asking.
No, it's quite ridiculous in fact.
:rolleyes:
If the iPad devices are as powerful as our computers, we would not be experiencing any issues in Safari. You're talking about just 256MB of RAM in the first-gen iPad and 512MB in second-gen iPad which are able to handle the sites in Safari much better than it does in the first-gen iPad. Add 2GB-4GB to the iPad, Mobile Safari would be able to handle 20 sites without any refreshing required.
Yes, I acknowledged that Macs have significantly more RAM than the 512mb of iPad 2's, but that doesn't remove the possibility. If the iPad had 2gb of RAM it would conceivably happen eventually. Say on my macbook running lion I were to open 30 safari tabs (for some people that is not uncommon), then my wife comes and uploads pictures, edits them in Lightroom, then plays some angry birds. Then my (hypothetical) kids come along and play a few hardware intensive games, and maybe open a new safari window to browse the internet. Then I come back and write some word documents and excel spreadsheets. I go to bed, then go to work the next day (who knows what all my wife and kids do on the computer). EVERYTHING is left "open" because we are on Lion so nobody closes anything. I come home and go back to my safari tabs. Is it even POSSIBLE to have some of the tabs disappear or need to be refreshed to view? Would some of my full screen "spaces" apps disappear as well? What if my macbook only has 1gb of RAM? That's only double the iPad 2. I don't think it's that inconceivable
Secondly, Apple didn't take open/close lights away, it is now an optional setting in the Systems Preferences. The reason Apple did this is because they want to remove the idea of "open"/"closed" states.
I know why they did it. And that is the way Apple wants it, that's why it's default. If it were up to Apple the option to put it back would be gone. But they were smart enough to anticipate the "outrage"
The software are starting to catch up to the hardware in terms of speed that we can leave applications and return to it in the same state. Apple wants to be able to introduce the concept of *resuming* apps, not *closed*. When you restart Lion with open apps, Lion will restart with the same open apps in the same state. This is the future on Mac OS X. No more closing required, especially with a fast SSD.
This is my point of concern. No closing could cause apps to "close" that you didn't want them to. Now most of them would be able to *resume* as left with no issue. But would 30 safari tabs be handled the same way?
The hard drive/ssd in today's computers are much faster than the NANDs in the current iPad. Resuming an app is much faster than it would be on a modern computer. Look at how fast apps are resuming from the previous state in the iPad 2 and you can see how much the hardware difference is affecting the performance.
speed of resuming has nothing to do with what I'm talking about...
The other thing that you need to consider is the memory swap. Mac OS X have swap, iOS doesn't. Even if you run out of free memory on the Macs, you'll begin to switch to the harddrive/ssd to use as virtual memory.Well finally we get to something that might actually be helpful. This would help to explain why Macs don't do this. But are there any issues/concerns with this?
If you had tried running Lion, you would know by now that this is simply not the case.
Well, I obviously haven't. That's why I'm asking.
No, it's quite ridiculous in fact.
:rolleyes:
jlblodgett
Aug 9, 02:39 PM
Sooo... Can you do this over 3g, or just wifi?
You must be connected to a WiFi network to DOWNLOAD the shows.
Not sure if you have to be "connected" to anything once the shows are downloaded.
You must be connected to a WiFi network to DOWNLOAD the shows.
Not sure if you have to be "connected" to anything once the shows are downloaded.
kwajo.com
Dec 18, 08:47 PM
still looking :p
NutsNGum
Apr 20, 04:21 PM
Sorry for the slow reply, was doing a bit of spider removal.
Viewing angles on most IPS panels should be around 178 degrees. One thing to consider is, are you going to be looking at it from an unusual angle? Most people I know look at monitors from the front! :D
Only direction you'll notice real degradation in picture quality on an IPS is vertically and that won't be an issue, unless you're freakishly tall and you like your monitor at your ankles.
I used to worry a lot about similar things but once I'd researched it realised that there doesn't seem to be a huge amount of difference until you start spending lots and lots of money, and at that point it'll be past the stage of diminishing returns for average computer users.
Viewing angles on most IPS panels should be around 178 degrees. One thing to consider is, are you going to be looking at it from an unusual angle? Most people I know look at monitors from the front! :D
Only direction you'll notice real degradation in picture quality on an IPS is vertically and that won't be an issue, unless you're freakishly tall and you like your monitor at your ankles.
I used to worry a lot about similar things but once I'd researched it realised that there doesn't seem to be a huge amount of difference until you start spending lots and lots of money, and at that point it'll be past the stage of diminishing returns for average computer users.
2nyRiggz
Mar 24, 09:29 AM
This movie will suck......please please let Uwe Boll direct it:rolleyes:
Mario film...cult status....more like 50cent bin status
MPrime...a movie without any dialogue just trippy movie...cool sounds like 2001 to me.
Note: Anything Silent Hill rocks!...the movie was grand...not sticking to the story but none the less.
Bless
Mario film...cult status....more like 50cent bin status
MPrime...a movie without any dialogue just trippy movie...cool sounds like 2001 to me.
Note: Anything Silent Hill rocks!...the movie was grand...not sticking to the story but none the less.
Bless
simsaladimbamba
May 3, 07:36 PM
Maybe this can help:
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=914340
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=914340
blueprint1983
Feb 22, 08:56 PM
touchOSC
